
There are two primary ways to quantify short-term rental supply:
| Measurement | Definition | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Active listing count | Number of active listings with at least one booking or calendar update in the past 12 months | Quick market sizing and growth tracking |
| Total available nights | Sum of all available nights across every active listing | Granular capacity and absorption analysis |
Example: A market with 500 active listings, each blocking an average of 25 nights per month, carries a monthly supply of 12,500 available nights — a number that scales naturally when comparing markets of different sizes.

In AirROI's analysis of 63,323 active listings across eight US markets, supply depth ranges from over 11,000 listings in New York to around 4,300 in Scottsdale — a 2.7× spread driven by metro size, tourism volume, and regulatory environment. Critically, high listing count does not translate into high performance: New York and Los Angeles lead on supply yet post some of the lowest occupancy rates in the basket (49% and 48%), while compact resort markets like Scottsdale (49% occupancy, $421 ADR) extract far more revenue per listing despite fewer total units.
High supply is not inherently bearish — what matters is the ratio of supply to demand. A market with 10,000 listings and surging traveler nights can outperform one with 2,000 listings and stagnant bookings. Always read supply alongside occupancy and RevPAR.
Supply dynamics directly shape your earning potential across four dimensions:
| Annual Growth Rate | Market Condition | Host Implication |
|---|---|---|
| 0–5% | Stable / mature | Steady competition; focus on optimization and quality differentiation |
| 5–15% | Healthy growth | Increasing competition; track submarket-level absorption rate |
| 15–25% | Rapid expansion | Monitor saturation signals; stress-test revenue projections |
| 25%+ | Potential oversupply | Elevated risk of declining occupancy and ADR; review investment thesis |
New York City's Local Law 18, enforced from September 2023, required hosts to register in person and prohibited short stays unless the host was physically present — effectively banning most entire-home short-term rentals. AirROI data shows active listings falling from roughly 26,775 in September 2023 to approximately 10,500 by early 2026, a 60% decline. Short-stay listings specifically dropped around 90%. The median minimum-night requirement in the NYC market is now 25.8 nights, reflecting a near-total shift to 30-day stays.
STR supply is measured by counting active listings in a market over a defined period. An active listing is one that has received at least one booking or calendar update in the trailing 12 months. Supply can also be expressed as total available nights — the sum of all open calendar nights across every active listing in the market.
Growth rates vary sharply by market. Heavily regulated metros like New York City saw supply collapse after Local Law 18 took effect in September 2023, dropping from roughly 26,775 active listings to around 10,500 by early 2026 — a 60% decline. Meanwhile, lighter-touch markets in the Sun Belt and mountain destinations continue to see meaningful supply growth.
Rising supply without matching demand growth intensifies competition, compressing occupancy rates and nightly rates. In AirROI's data, the highest-supply markets — New York (11,468 listings) and Los Angeles (10,134) — also carry some of the lowest occupancy rates, at 49% and 48% respectively. Monitoring supply trends helps you anticipate pricing pressure before it hits revenue.
The terms are often used interchangeably. "Supply" typically refers to active listing count or available nights at a point in time. "Inventory" can include listed but blocked or paused properties. For practical market analysis, active listing count is the most actionable measure because it reflects real competition.
Regulations are the most powerful supply-shock mechanism in the STR market. New York City's 30-day minimum-night rule effectively eliminated short-stay listings, cutting supply by roughly 60%. Markets under heavy regulatory regimes consistently show lower active listing counts and, where demand holds, higher ADR and RevPAR for remaining compliant hosts.
Stay ahead of the curve
Join our newsletter for exclusive insights and updates. No spam ever.